Archive for the 'Amazing Women in Sport' Category

TED – TALKS/TED PARTNER SERIES – Aimee Mullins: The opportunity of adversity

The thesaurus might equate “disabled” with synonyms like “useless” and “mutilated,” but ground-breaking runner Aimee Mullins is out to redefine the word. Defying these associations, she shows how adversity — in her case, being born without shinbones — actually opens the door for human potential.

Goto Full Video Presentation by Aimee - “CLICK HERE”

About Aimee Mullins - “CLICK HERE”
__________________________________________________________________________________________

Published January 19th, 2012

THE “PROPER” GENDER OF ATHLETES – Presentation at “Play the Game” conference 2011

By GEORG FACIUS – DENMARK

Gender verification is a serious issue, actually a dead serious issue, and is has a long and sad history within sport.

But let me start by mentioning two very recent initiatives related to the gender issue in sport.

Earlier this year the “Court of Arbitration for Sport” has approved jurisdiction to take on a legal case against the International Olympic Committee, under the headline: “Human Rights and the Oppression of Women´s Gender in International Sport”. The outcome of this may very well bring about one of the biggest changes of all times in international sport.

A “Gender Pin Badge” has been designed for London 2012 and was unveiled on September 15th in the presence of London 2012 chief executive Paul Deighton, and the minister for Sport and the Olympics Hugh Robertson, and the deputy secretary general of the Council of Europe, Maud de Boer-Buquicchio.

Mr. Deighton stated: “Our vision is as bold as it is simple – to use the power of the Games to inspire change, and one way of showing our support for a sporting environment built upon equality and inclusion”

Facius calls it, “The Major Medical Blunder of the 20^th Century” continuing to state, ” All along through most of these 50 years Arne Ljungquist has been the man with the overall and main responsibility for gender testing, firstly within IAAF and now within the IOC, and it is beyond me how he himself, with his history, can continue in charge of this, and as chairman of the IOC medical commission, and how on top of 50 years of failure, he can be allowed to do so, by the responsible bodies. I can only urge him to have the decency to step down.”

Goto Full Article - “CLICK HERE”
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Published – January 19th 2012

Laura Robson’s rainbow hair-band follows a long tradition of political statements in the sporting arena.
By Tanya Aldred

Political protest works best with simple imagery. Think of the black-gloved salutes, by Tommie Smith and John Carlos, at the 1968 Olympics or the black armbands worn by Andy Flower and Henry Olonga at the 2003 cricket World Cup.

Goto Full Article - “CLICK HERE”

Published January 18th, 2012

A picture paints a thousands words – International Olympic Committee (IOC) Executive Board (EB) meeting of 2011 wrapped up in Lausanne.

Source: IOC Newsletter released today Friday December 9th, 2011- Newsletter 93

Where are all the women IOC board executives? A picture paints a thousand words…

There are (two executive females) around the table – A true representation of the IOC’s vision of inclusion/development of women in sport and sport administration. Moreover the barriers of diversity and gender in the international system.

This is the problem, and an enormous one at that – facing so many athletes and women in the system from participation and excelling – let alone the gender policies that exist and the direct impact of gender policy/verification placing limits on women’s bodies by men. These are the guys making those decisions. It is outrageous, and those who are impacted directly the athletes wear these guys decisions directly – where they remain arms length from it all – Their vision of woman….

On more than average, a lot of grey hair in the room -

How can we move forward in sport, social development and project a model that is reflective of modern society and its future, when the climate is as such as this?  The answer, we cannot! Thus my own personal experience, this model slides down to other countries and NSO’s as it pertains to sport governance and administration practices models.

This photo this morning sent out by the IOC media was just shocking – but again speaks volumes to the challenges and barriers of international sport governance, inclusive policy and best practices models for access for women and moving the yard sticks forward around issues of diversity that effect so many people around the world – we cannot when the model looks like this.

Women will continue to be put in a vulnerable place and continued injustices – and barriers will continue, and the “catastrophic” impact it has had on so many already and in the future.

Need is say more …

The IOC neither for nor against the call from Play the Game 2011

In a letter to offices of Play the Game and the rector of the German Sport University Cologne dated 9 November 2011 and sent by email two days later, the IOC’s Director General Christophe de Kepper completely avoids mentioning these key proposals in the ‘Cologne Consensus’.

Instead, the top executive of the IOC in general terms welcomes the initiative, stressing that the subject of good governance in sport “has been of greatest concern to the IOC and has been treated as a priority over the last years, dedicating a lot of efforts to move forward in the right direction”.

Christophe de Kepper also points out the work the IOC has been doing in creating a set of “Basic Universal Principles of Good Governance in Sport” and getting them approved by all international federations and national Olympic committees.

“As we will not be able to call all participants back to Cologne and discuss the answer from the IOC, we can only guess what they think,” says international director of Play the Game, Jens Sejer Andersen.

Athletic Body Diversity – Photo-shoot of various Olympic-level athletes by Howard Schartz and Beverly Ornstein titled “The Athlete”

This is a photo-shoot of various Olympic-level athletes by Howard Schartz and Beverly Ornstein titled “The Athlete”. Like many others I tend to fall into the trap of drawing the same body type over and over for athletic characters. This photoshoot serves as awesome reference reminding us artists that strong bodies come in all kinds of shapes and sizes and muscles show up in different ways. It also helps us keep in mind that not everyone who is fit is also lean. There’s often a layer of fat over the muscles, making them less visible for some. I wanted to share this in a convenient way so here it is:

Goto Entire Collection “Click Here”

Published November 2011

Play the Game 2011 – Gender Session – IOC Medical Chair deemed “Incompetent” after 50 years of the “failure” of gender testing and policy. Asked to step down immediately!

Monday October 3rd, 2011 organizers of Play the Game during a week long conference  titled; “Bring Change to the heart of Sport” with leading delegates and experts converging on Cologne Germany, at the University of Cologne to discuss issues impacting international and Olympic sport programming. From issues of anti-doping, sport gambling, organizational corruption and issues of gender and human rights.

On Wednesday, the session titled; “Little Difference, Huge Impact: The Gender Challenge to Sport” began the day. Led by a joint key note presentation from Prof. Arne Ljungqvist, International Olympic Committee [IOC] Chairman – father of gender testing and policy. Presenting in direct parallel with Ljungqvist was Danish Georg Facius, IAAF Technical Official and key official and expert of both the EAA’s Anti-doping and Competition Committees.

Upon conclusion of Facius ground breaking presentation which he states; “All along through most of these 50 years Arne Ljungquist has been the man with the overall and main responsibility for gender testing, firstly within IAAF and now within the IOC, and it is beyond me how he himself, with his history, can continue in charge of this, and as chairman of the IOC medical commission, and how on top of 50 years of failure, he can be allowed to do so, by the responsible bodies. I can only urge him to have the decency to step down.”

Georg Facius complete  presentation titled; “Trying to Verify The “Proper” Gender of Athletes”

Later that afternoon, Canadian Dr. Bruce Kidd, O.C., PhD. and Olympian in mens athletics presented in parallel to Georg Facius earlier keynote presentation with Ljungqvist, titled; “For gender self-declaration”. Kidd, speaks about “Misdiagnosis”, saying; “The Challenge is NOT “intersex” or atypically athletes. But a social problem resulting from reassertion of moral physiology, fear/demonization of difference and patriarchal control of sport.”
Going further to suggest that there is “so much variation among humans” from “body composition and biochemistry, household and community resources, especially access to bio-medical technology and sport sciences, cultural norms of which are all related to competitive performance.”

Kidd suggests, “The Olympic Movement “celebrates humanity” in all its diversity, why single out this area of difference?” And that, “Self-identify is fundamental to human rights and the ideal of self-expression that is the basis of Olympic sport.” Then asking the fundamental question, “How can the Olympic Movement, which encourages and affirms the right of self-expression through sport, deny the right of self-identity to some humans?”

Upon conclusion, Dr. Kidd profoundly states; “By elevating the results of performance to be the determining metric of the Olympic Movement, the new gender verification requirements further marginalize the educational and intercultural goals of Coubertin, ” the “chill of surveillance culture is heightened.”

Thus stating, as did Facius in his earlier presentation stated; “The IOC must abolish the targeted ‘gender investigation’ once and for all.” Going one step further giving recommendations as next steps, removing the IOC from making such decisions that effect all sport as it pertains to gender, and that; “Academics, policy makers and journalists contribute to this effort, especially the deconstruction of gender and the furtherance of inclusive language.” and move towards; “The Olympic Movement and the broad sport community re-invigorate their efforts to empower women, especially at the level of leadership.” and; “As much as possible, school and community sport be re-organized on the basis of athletic ability, rather than gender.”

Published October 2011

__________________________________________________________________________________
(6) Key Supporting References -
__________________________________________________________________________________
NYTimes – April 24th, 2011 – Redefining the Sexes in Unequal Terms

Author: Prof. Alice Dreger, clinical medical humanities and bioethics.

Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
For Full Article “Click Here”

Transgender Student-Athletes and Sex-Segregated Sport: Developing Policies of Inclusion for Intercollegiate and Interscholastic Athletics

Erin Buzuvis
Western New England College School of Law – July 20, 2010

Download Complete Research Document “PDF” CLICK HERE

Volume 9 Issue 6 – June 2011 World Sports Law Report
Eligibility: The IAAF hyperandrogenism regulations and discrimination
Author: Shawn Crincoli – Associate Professor of Law

Touro College, New York, USA.
For Full Article “Click Here”

Volume 9 Issue 4 – April 2011 World Sports Law Report
IAAF: hyperandrogenism rules are challenge proof
Author: Andy Brown [WSLR], UK.
For Full Article “Click Here”

__________________________________________________________________________________

Lancet 2005; 366: S38 María José Martínez-Patiño
Personal Account A woman tried and tested

“As I was about to enter the January, 1986, national championships, I was
told to feign an injury and to withdraw from racing quietly, graciously, and
permanently. I refused. When I crossed the line first in the 60m hurdles, my
story was leaked to the press. I was expelled from our athletes’ residence, my
sports scholarship was revoked, and my running times were erased from my
country’s athletics records. I felt ashamed and embarrassed. I lost friends, my
fiancé, hope, and energy. But I knew that I was a woman, and that my genetic
difference gave me no unfair physical advantage. I could hardly pretend to be
a man; I have breasts and a vagina. I never cheated. I fought my
disqualification.”

Download Full Review “Click Here”

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

An approach to the biological, historical and psychological repercussions of gender verification in top level competitions

Martínez-Patiño et al. / Gender verification in top level competitions JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE – VOLUME 5 | ISSUE 3 | 2010 |

MARÍA JOSÉ MARTÍNEZ-PATIÑO1, COVADONGA MATEOS-PADORNO2, AURORA MARTÍNEZ-VIDAL3, ANA MARÍA SÁNCHEZ MOSQUERA1, JOSÉ LUIS GARCÍA SOIDÁN1, MARÍA DEL PINO DÍAZ PEREIRA3, CARLOS FRANCISCO TOURIÑO GONZÁLEZ1
1Faculty of Science Education and Sport, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
2Department of Physical Education, University of Las Palmas, Campus Universitario de Tafira, Spain
3Special Didactics Department. Faculty of Science Education. University of Vigo. Orense, Spain

Download Complete Review “Click Here”

__________________________________________________________________________________

Published September 2011

US Women’s Sports Foundation – Intersex “Position Statement” discards respect of individual women athletes’ legal rights and privacy.

The US Women’s Sports Foundation [USWSF] published their position statement “PARTICIPATION OF INTERSEX ATHLETES IN WOMEN’S SPORTS” on September 20th, 2011.

Linking a respected international athlete NAME, IMAGE and in context directly in the “Position Statement”. Online, in the “Content Summary” using her name, and suggesting a medical type, which is in-fact UNTRUE. The impact to her life is enormous, as it is and would be to any other athlete. It is unbelievable that any recognized organization let alone the USWSF has done this, and felt empowered enough that they could, breaking basic legal and ethical standards, let alone feel have a right to exploit and athletes life.

In any case, this is illegal in the context of developing a public statement and policy, by a national organization that governs in this case, women’s sport. It is illegal anytime, let alone in sport. The use of pseudonyms should be always used, assuring protection of a person(s) individual identity, respecting their privacy. The second problem, the USWSF has attached this athletes, NAME and IDENTITY with use of a photographic image as the introduction to the Position Statement. Thus feeling they have the right to exploit an athletes medial history, which is in-fact UNTRUE. Furthermore the inaccuracies throughout the document around the topic of Intersex.

Image used on USWSF website:

The irony is, the USWSF speak about inclusion, and by design of the communications on their website, as well the final “Position Statement”.

On the heals of the NCAA policy statement around inclusion of transgender athletes on September 13th, 2011 – Speaks volume to the greater problem that is occurring in policy development around gender. First of all, the people who are in-fact experts, are not engaged in development of these policies. Moreover, and most importantly, in both cases clearly illustrates, if an athlete is “assumed” outside the Atypical binary, that as the USWSF has clearly illustrated, that an athletes personal rights and privacy is revoked. And that, USWSF has now has clearly broken the law, and obviously felt empowered that they had a right to do this without any conscious thought, as certainly the level of the communications design supports this.

We don’t need to police athletes or gender, we need to police the person(s) an organizations who are creating horrific policy who in-fact are the problem. At the end of the day, the athletes are the ones that are directly paying for it.

The use of the word “Approved” by the NCAA, who’s approving what…? In the case of the USWSF, again begs simple questions of just basic legal responsibilities of individuals.

Inclosing, the athletes are not the problem. It is those in organizations such as the USWSF and NCAA , one unqualified and as illustrated complete incompetence to ascertain and or develop policy to this regard. Yet again, as the NCAA has displayed, and now USWSF, that they are only happy to engage in illegal practices, clearly for notoriety and financial compensation at the very risk and continued catastrophic outcomes of other female athletes careers and lives. Ironically, breaking all ethical and legal standards and responsibilities, as a national body to govern women’s sport, and followed around the world, that in this case is UNTRUE.

This is a great example of the actual problem! Having nothing to do with the athletes whatsoever. All to do with those suggesting expertise and those developing policy let alone thinking their is even a need for it who are in-fact the problem – creating catastrophic outcomes impacting individual athletes only to last them a lifetime.[sic]

The irony is, and in this very case who developed this position statement are legally trained individuals, thus inappropriately breaking and disregarding basic legal rights and privacy of individuals. Thus too, paralleling a individual to a a medical “type” which is in-fact, UNTRUE. [sic]

USWSF, who is watching who? As clearly illustrated,  have no standards of practice and du-diligence.

Goto Full Position Statement – “Click Here”

Published October 2011

ESPN Olympic Sports – Track and Field
Column: Women need men to set records? Yes, and no
Associated Press
September 23, 201

World’s highest mountain? Easy. World’s fastest man? Easy, too. The world record for female marathon running? That, too, used to be a cinch until the bright sparks who oversee track and field delivered a slap against women everywhere by invalidating their records set when they run marathons alongside men.

The not-so-subtle message is that women cannot complete 26.2 miles as quickly alone as they can when they have a helping hand from the guys.

That, as it happens, may be true. Still, that doesn’t make this rule change from the IAAF any less offensive, impractical or confusing. It’s also a giant black-eye for Paula Radcliffe.

Her world record of 2 hours, 15 minutes, 25 seconds set in London in 2003 is one of the all-time great sport performances by anyone, anywhere. No other woman, except for Radcliffe herself, has ever run within three minutes of that mark.

Goto Full Article - “Click Here”

Published September 2011

Sept 20, 2011 – US Womens Sports Foundation… Positions Statement PARTICIPATION OF INTERSEX ATHLETES IN WOMEN’S SPORTS

The Women’s Sports Foundation believes that women with intersex conditions have the same rights to participation in athletics as all women. It is also our position that eligibility standards for women’s sports that require an athlete to demonstrate particular hormone levels promote the policing of gender by medical means, leading to the unwarranted invasions of privacy not only for intersex athletes, but any athlete whose femininity is questioned. Moreover, any policy that singles out women’s sports for eligibility based on hormone levels is discriminatory and sends the harmful message that female athletes are uniquely vulnerable and in need of special protection from the normal, natural variation in size, skill, and athletic ability that exists among members of either sex.

Download Complete Policy Statement “Click Here”

Published September 2011

Absolute Brilliants! September 21st, 2011 – Ladies European Tour [LET] – STRONG START FOR BAGGER IN DINARD LADIES OPEN.

Denmark’s Mianne Bagger made a strong start at the Dinard Ladies Open, in Brittany.

The Dane scored an opening round of six-under-par 64 on a blustery and cool day at Dinard Golf on the coast of north-western France.

Bagger, who started on the tenth hole and carded five birdies for an outward 29 and 35 on her back nine, was delighted with her round. She said “I putted really well today, I had just 25 putts. I changed putters last week to an old ‘Bull’s Eye’ that I’ve had for 12 years and I holed everything. The greens are rolling really well.”

Goto Full LET Article “Click Here”

Published September 2011

NCAA Transgender Policy “Forced Androgen Reduction” with no supporting facts, science or evidence to support their policy.

Met with great sadness and concern for athlete safety,  the NCAA’s announcement of September 13th, 2011 regarding policy development around the projected assumption of “inclusionary” practices and protocol for transgendered male and female athletes in US intercollegiate and high school sport. Many academics were taken back, how a policy of such a large institution such as the NCAA could ever develop and write a policy with NO FACTS let alone NO SUPPORTING SCIENCE OR EVIDENCE.  All to familiar as this is exactly what the International Olympic Committee [IOC] did in 2003 in development of the Stockholm Consensus regarding transitioned women in participation and in International and Olympic sporting events. Which misled sport, sport organizations and media around the world. Leading to projected ignorance, which has led to the most humiliating and catastrophic circumstances for so many women in international sport. Never actually testing one single  transitioned high performance athlete.

This is NOT an LGB – T issue, nor is it a transgender issue, gender is everyone’s issue. The very fact the NCAA has developed and published such a policy, targeting a specific “type” of woman and or man, isolating them speaks volume how little the NCAA understands, let alone those hired to consult them.

Androgens are a hormone property of both women and men. It is not just a male hormone. Women’s ovaries are males testicles, where the majority of testosterone is developed for both (sexes). Do to the influx of the Y chromosome after 10-12 weeks of gustation, as we ALL start off as female the Y chromosome signals a rise in the production of testosterone, thus creating common male sex characteristics. Important to note, we as human-beings require testosterone as the very foundation of our bodily functions. As science illustrates, like men, high performance female athletes have elevated testosterone levels min. 4-6 times greater then non-athletic women. This is caused by years of training, as recovery signals the pituitary gland to the ovaries, to produce more androgens to assist in body recovery and muscle development. A similar response by the hypothalamus occurs signaling higher production of the  natural human growth hormone [HGH] too.
__________________________________________________________________________________

NYTimes – April 24th, 2011 – Redefining the Sexes in Unequal Terms
Author: Prof. Alice Dreger, clinical medical humanities and bioethics.
Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Go To Full Article: “Click Here”
__________________________________________________________________________________

Most importantly and keeping this simple, the World Anti-Doping Agency[WADA] in the anti-doping testing program does NOT test for female and or male natural developing serum bio-testosterone levels and or HGH levels. All they test for is irregularities in levels, and for synthetic androgen and or HGH compounds in the blood.

WADA could NOT tell you what the serum bio-testosterone levels for women is, thus too if they could though testosterone is available in a person(s) individual body higher or lower then their competing athlete and colleagues, the androgen receptors is unique in each person, and use it more or less from one and other. A number, it they did have that measurement, it depends on the individual athletes body and how it uses it.

Like the men, we too take advantage of women’s higher then normal levels, which is part and parcel of their physiology traits together that make them exceptional.
__________________________________________________________________________________
The NCAA Press Release States:

A trans male (female to male) student-athlete who has received a medical exception for treatment with testosterone for gender transition may compete on a men’s team but is no longer eligible to compete on a women’s team without changing the team status to a mixed team. A mixed team is eligible only for men’s championships.

A trans female (male to female) student-athlete being treated with testosterone suppression medication for gender transition may continue to compete on a men’s team but may not compete on a women’s team without changing it to a mixed team status until completing one calendar year of documented testosterone-suppression treatment.
__________________________________________________________________________________

When knowing the facts, these statements are IMPOSSIBLE and in-fact UNTRUE. Moreover, why anyone would suppress anyone’s androgen levels in the first place is ridiculous, as there are dozens of reasons why athletes male and female athletes out perform one athlete over an other. Usain Bolt, Mike Phelps and Serena Williams are great examples of this who dominate their competitors. Very little to do with androgen levels, but part of a combination excessive physiological and biological variables. Not pinning their performances to just one hormone – ANDROGENS.

Furthermore, which I(we) found interesting was that the NCAA feels androgens are the problem and determining factor of (male performance over women).  Which leads to the bigger question when you suggest you want to suppress a students levels of androgens, as we explained above and is critical to this discussion, you have NO CLUE WHAT LEVEL/NUMBER YOU WOULD SUPPRESS AN ATHLETES ANDROGEN LEVELS? As well, could not give either for what purpose and or reason? Too ensure like the IOC has done, they are unable to compete in their chosen sport, let alone well and to their very best ability? Moreover,  impossible to regulate such a process, of which leading international organizations such as WADA are just starting to do through the TUE and Passport system, and with the right expertise.

What the NCAA needs to understand, you are forcing a young person into “forced menopause.”

Low testosterone levels parallels symptoms that would be seen with individuals (women and men) who suffer from Hypogondism which are distinguishingly different from an normal aging adult going though gradual menopause over a 20 year period. The effects are;
- Weight Gain – Metabolism issues
- Losing Muscle – decreased endurance and becoming weak
- Fatigue – (Muscular, respiratory and psychological)
- Muscle Atrophe – Unable to develop muscle, let alone retain muscle
- Amemia – Red blood cell count decreases – less ability to carry oxygen to large muscle groups. Body actually suffocates during high performance activity
- Depression and Anxiety
- Poor Memory
*Treated through Testosterone Replacement Therapy (TRT)

The NCAA is setting themselves up for Human Rights issues, let alone how scientifically and socially unethical this policy is. For the very purpose of sport participation, without any facts/science willing to suppress a young person(s) androgen levels into oblivion (of which you have no safe markers) to fit into a man-made system which not one person fits into, with no knowledge, and or understanding the physical and physiological impact to an individual athlete.

For reasons above is reckless and medically and socially unethical. I can give over a dozen international examples of outcomes onto women athletes causing, global humiliation, poverty and attempted suicide do to poor, misinformed and unnecessary gender policies.

Policies like gender testing (1967), the Stockholm Consensus (2003), hyperandrogenism regulations (2011) and the most recent NCAA policy  are developed tools of oppression towards women specifically and not designed on fact and or science supported, but speculation and have only led to profound catastrophic circumstances for so many athletes around the world over (4) decades. Creating tools/policies to control women’s gender and athletic development and performances, where for men, there are NO MAN-MADE IMPOSED LIMITS OR BARRIERS BASED ON ONES SEX.

WHEN ARE WE GOING TO LEARN?  HOW MANY WOMEN HAVE TO BE HURT OR EVEN KILLED BEFORE THIS IS STOPPED?

Getting educated and moving away from de-criminatory and exclusionary practices (which the NCAA calls inclusion) and development of such polices as recently
the NCAA has done and as many experts greatly surprised with ALL the NCAA’s resources available, once educated and understand the the truths, there
was never a need for policy, but more time spent on education and part of the greater issues of diversity of which each one of us are part of ONE TEAM.

Gender in sport is EVERYONE’S ISSUE!

Published September 2011

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 12, 2011 - NCLR Applauds New NCAA Inclusion Policy through “FORCED MEDICALIZATON” suggesting it Benefits Transgender Student Athletes in Intercollegiate and High School Sport Athletes.

The National Center For Lesbian Rights applauds the NCAA for their “inclusion” policy of which they were contracted to guide the NCAA around the issues of gender variant young women and men in intercollegiate and high school sport in the United States. Without evidence, approved a policy which forces young college and high school students, who have varying degrees of “gender variance” to seek “forced medicalization” of their bodies to which their gender naturally identifies, to “PLAY A GAME/SPORT” to be seen as socially acceptable, either one of the distinct two binaries, male or female. Of which, not one living human being fits let alone athlete.

This is outrageous,  and to force a child/young adult  through forced medicalization based on problems with social science, and if proper applied science and research was actually done, there is no issue for a gender variant youth to participate in their given sport of which they identify.

“We are using policy to force change nature to meet a man-made binary, rather than changing the man-made binary to meet nature’s design.”

This is a social ethics problem, the NCAA has failed horribly. The document speaks to men being superior to women physically. Not so. Thus asking much bigger question of ALL women, and how women are seen in sport and society.  This just reflects the current social problems and women’s barriers to participation.

This announcement by the NCLR and NCAA is very sad. Certainly not accurate and or reflective of sport, sport science and where sport is going as it pertains to gender.  This is a step backwards, and only reinforcing male/female narrow stereotypes and is not inclusive, in-fact forced exclusion.  Telling young gender variant women and men of varying degrees, which is common and natural, “forced medicalization” must take place if you wish to participate and “PLAY A GAME”. Along with that, we will make you jump through hoops and out yourself to do it. Moreover keeping in mind, as they mention one all privately and in confidence. Though completely unnecessary and inaccurate this policy, historically there has never been ONE incident where an athlete he/she has ever been protected and or privacy respected. It is impossible the NCAA and NCLR cannot provide privacy.

I worry greatly for a child ever getting into a situation where these institutions  can ever use such horrific policies.  Already vulnerable and terrified, this does not protect the athlete, but the NCAA.  This policy sets the NCAA up for a massive human rights case by a child/young adult ever having to go through such a process to play their sport.  Not with standing, the catastrophic impact to the individual athlete.

What were they thinking – We are forcing young people through policy to change their bodies to which they identify, to meet a man-made binary to play a game, to “fit in” within a binary code know-one fits. Instead of thinking outside the box, changing sport and sport policy” we are forcing nature to change to fit dated policy (which only reinforces the male stereo-type and division between two sexes),  forcing young people back into the very box they have spent their entire lives fighting to get out of.

That is the NCAA’s and NCLR’s vision of inclusion. How about starting over, and work on education and ‘Best Practices’ and not policy. You can’t create policy if you don’t have the right information.

An all time low for the NCAA, sport and diversity/inclusion.  A policy to be proud of NCLR. This is not an inclusive policy, in-fact completely exclusionary.

NCLR Press Release September 12, 2011 “Click Here”

NCAA Press Release September 13, 2011“Click Here”

__________________________________________________________________________________
(6) Key Supporting References -
__________________________________________________________________________________
NYTimes – April 24th, 2011 – Redefining the Sexes in Unequal Terms

Author: Prof. Alice Dreger, clinical medical humanities and bioethics.

Feinberg School of Medicine at Northwestern University. Chicago, Illinois, USA.
For Full Article “Click Here”

Transgender Student-Athletes and Sex-Segregated Sport: Developing Policies of Inclusion for Intercollegiate and Interscholastic Athletics

Erin Buzuvis
Western New England College School of Law – July 20, 2010

Download Complete Research Document “PDF” CLICK HERE

Volume 9 Issue 6 – June 2011 World Sports Law Report
Eligibility: The IAAF hyperandrogenism regulations and discrimination
Author: Shawn Crincoli – Associate Professor of Law

Touro College, New York, USA.
For Full Article “Click Here”

Volume 9 Issue 4 – April 2011 World Sports Law Report
IAAF: hyperandrogenism rules are challenge proof
Author: Andy Brown [WSLR], UK.
For Full Article “Click Here”

__________________________________________________________________________________

Lancet 2005; 366: S38 María José Martínez-Patiño
Personal Account A woman tried and tested

“As I was about to enter the January, 1986, national championships, I was
told to feign an injury and to withdraw from racing quietly, graciously, and
permanently. I refused. When I crossed the line first in the 60m hurdles, my
story was leaked to the press. I was expelled from our athletes’ residence, my
sports scholarship was revoked, and my running times were erased from my
country’s athletics records. I felt ashamed and embarrassed. I lost friends, my
fiancé, hope, and energy. But I knew that I was a woman, and that my genetic
difference gave me no unfair physical advantage. I could hardly pretend to be
a man; I have breasts and a vagina. I never cheated. I fought my
disqualification.”

Download Full Review “Click Here”

__________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________

An approach to the biological, historical and psychological repercussions of gender verification in top level competitions

Martínez-Patiño et al. / Gender verification in top level competitions JOURNAL OF HUMAN SPORT & EXERCISE – VOLUME 5 | ISSUE 3 | 2010 |

MARÍA JOSÉ MARTÍNEZ-PATIÑO1, COVADONGA MATEOS-PADORNO2, AURORA MARTÍNEZ-VIDAL3, ANA MARÍA SÁNCHEZ MOSQUERA1, JOSÉ LUIS GARCÍA SOIDÁN1, MARÍA DEL PINO DÍAZ PEREIRA3, CARLOS FRANCISCO TOURIÑO GONZÁLEZ1
1Faculty of Science Education and Sport, University of Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain.
2Department of Physical Education, University of Las Palmas, Campus Universitario de Tafira, Spain
3Special Didactics Department. Faculty of Science Education. University of Vigo. Orense, Spain

Download Complete Review “Click Here”

__________________________________________________________________________________

Published September 2011

Inside The Games – London 2012 unveil design for gender pin badge
Thursday, 15 September 2011
By Tom Degun at the Handball Arena in London

__________________________________________________________________________________

September 15 – London 2012 have this evening revealed the design for the new gender pin badge here at the Handball Arena at the Olympic Park.

The unveiling ceremony was designed to coincide with the opening reception for the 2011 European Women and Sport conference, which will take place in the capital over the next three days.

Dignitaries in attendance included London 2012 chief executive Paul Deighton, Minister for Sport and the Olympics Hugh Robertson and deputy secretary general of the Council of Europe Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, while London 2012′s director of human resources Jean Tomlin unveiled the new gender pin badge.

This latest badge is the fourth to have been issued in celebration of London 2012′s six strands of diversity, engaging all communities to support London 2012.

The first of the six pin badges was launched last year in support of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community.

For Full Article “Click Here”

Published September 2011